Expert Reviews: The Mac Mini 2014 is a good upgrade for what was already an excellent entry-level Mac Tom’s Guide: An affordable and attractive OS X machine, though it sacrifices the.2. The Mac mini is an extremely capable Mac. The Mac mini is the cheapest Mac you can buy, and its 799 price tag is far from being its only great feature.
![]() Best Use Mini Mac Mini 2014Because of this design, components that used to be discrete are now integrated directly into the chip.Second, Apple provided a 6K 32-inch Pro Display XDR with my test Mac mini (these will be returned to Apple). In many ways, it’s more similar to the system powering phones and tablets than the chips used in traditional computers. The chipset is built around an ARM design with more integrated components than its CPU counterparts. Instead of a CPU, it’s an SoC — System on a Chip, which comes with advantages and concessions. One, the new Mac mini runs the M1 SoC, which is fundamentally different from its Intel predecessor. ReviewThere are several things you should know. What’s more, this performance increase is noticeable throughout the system and not just limited to raw computing tasks in purpose-built applications. With the M1 at its core, the Mac mini is faster in most regards than every Apple computer available except for the ultra-expensive Mac Pro — and sometimes the Mini is faster than the Mac Pro, too. We benchmarked these systems with similar conditions to demonstrate the differences between the units.In our tests, we found Apple’s M1 system on a chip (SoC) to outperform its rivals, regardless of price. I was able to hook up a third monitor through 3rd party software but it was unstable and should not be considered a capability.Lastly, you should know TechCrunch also reviewed the new 13-inch MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro. According to the Mac mini’s product page, the system is limited to two monitors. I installed and ran dozens of applications during my few days with the system and never experienced a roadblock. Will your legacy applications run on these machines? Will they run well? I can’t answer every variable. With the M1 chip, macOS (Big Sur) is light and free and a joy to use.Even better, the ARM-based M1 chip allows Macs to run iOS applications, and they run as smoothly on the Mac as they do on an iPad.There’s likely a hesitation around embracing a new Intel-less Mac. In the past, even on powerful machines, macOS has always felt heavy compared to iOS, but not anymore. Users will instantly notice the increase in speed, too, from startup time to launching apps. Editing video in Premiere was easier and less painful as I scrubbed through 6K footage. Lightroom loaded photo albums quicker and without hesitation. Edits in Photoshop seemed more fluid. Exporting the files still takes time, though, and this is one of the few tasks where Intel’s platform outperforms the M1.Even when using legacy software, the system preformed with ease. With Apple’s Final Cut Pro, the application loads seemingly instantly — two seconds from button press to it being open and ready to go.With the M1 chip, it’s less painful to edit 8K footage in the native Final Cut Pro app than it was to edit 4K footage on an Intel Mac. I didn’t find one application unable to run on the new platform.The largest speed increases are most noticeable when using native apps for the M1 processor. While it looks mostly the same, the macOS is now purpose-built for Apple’s own silicon. If Apple put a beachball in this system, I haven’t found it yet.The M1 chip is based on an ARM design, which required Apple to rework macOS to run on this new computing platform. Applications open instantly — all of them at the same time. Other items like rendering video and editing photos are just as fast, too. Common system-level tasks like launching apps, waking from sleep and unzipping files are lightning-fast. And yet, we found something surprising: Even the apps that are not re-coded yet are still impressively fast thanks to Apple’s Rosetta 2 that enables software encoded for Intel’s platform to run on the new Apple platform and take advantage of the M1’s power.For most uses, this holistic approach of building the hardware and software results in major advantages. ![]() The M1 is also available in Apple’s 13-inch MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro. The new Mac lineupThe Mac mini has two siblings. By looking at multiple tests, the results draw a common conclusion. This puts systems on common ground. We took it one step further, too, and charted the performance between Apple’s top-of-the-line systems and the new 13-inch MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro.Benchmarks often oversimplify results, but in this case, they seem necessary. However, based on our testing, the GPU performance in these M1 systems are impressive and could be good enough for most, even in creative media editing applications.In addition to common workflows, I ran through some industry benchmarks to see how the system responds and came away impressed. Adobe for mac free downloadIn the MacBook Pro and Mini, the SoC is cooled by a fan, while a heatsink is used in the Air.What does this mean for you? For most users, the Air’s performance is sufficient as it only slows down during long, intensive tasks. The Air started to fall short in the longer tests, and that’s likely due to its passive cooling that does not feature a fan. Because of the improved cooling, the MacBook Pro and Mac mini are better suited for sustained performance.In our testing, all three machines performed similarly. The same computing platform powers all three but feature different cooling schemes in the MacBook Pro and Mac mini. This is also likely an M1 limitation, and something I would expect would be addressed in future chipset revisions.Multiple monitor support is a major downside to the M1 Mac mini. There are countless ways to expand the Thunderbolt capability of the Mac mini, and to me, the performance of the machine outweighs the port limitation.The M1 Mac mini also lacks a 10GB Ethernet option, limiting its use as a server for some users. For some users, this could be a deal-breaker, though it’s not for me. The M1 Mac mini only sports two Thunderbolt 3 inputs. We found most of the claims to be factual. We ran a handful of benchmarks on the M1 systems, comparing them against the most recent Macs, including the Mac Pro.Benchmarks paint with a broad stroke and often miss nuances. BenchmarksApple, when promoting the M1-powered computers, laid out some wild claims about the chipset. To some, including me, multiple monitor support is a major issue and two monitors are often not enough. I was able to get a third monitor running at low resolution through third-party software, but it was unstable and performed poorly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorStephanie ArchivesCategories |